~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
You can't turn on the news these days without hearing a little more trash talk about Nadya Doud, the single mom in California who gave birth to octuplets this week. What started out as the glamorization of multiple births has now morphed into condemnation of everyone from the fertility doctor who started this chaos, to the grandmother of the octuplets who filed for bankruptcy last year. I have so many issues with this story, but for now I'll try to focus just a bit.
It should come as no surprise that people might see multiple births as an opportunity to be famous. What with YouTube, American Idol and Survivor, just to name a few, we've raised a generation who not only strives to be famous at any cost (public humiliation seeming to be a favorite), but actually believes they are "entitled" fame. Add in a few shows like John and Kate Plus 8 and the new Duggar Family series, 17 Kids and Counting, and it becomes clear that our society financially rewards the "freak show."
Now, part of the problem stems from the fact that, with a rare exception, families cannot afford to raise 8 ... or 17 ... children. According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture's new Cost of Raising a Child Calculator, the average family will spend $171,926 raising a single child from birth through high school graduation. Multiply that times 14 (the number of children it is now known the Californian mom has) and you've got a total cost of $2,406,964. That number doesn't include the anticipated $1.2 million in medical expenses projected just in the birth, delivery and hospital care (2 months) for these octuplets. Being that they were born 9 weeks prematurely, it's likely they will have additional medical expenses - above and beyond what a parent can "normally" expect.
In this era of women's reproductive rights (at the expense of anyone elses rights - father's, embryo's, child's, society's, etc.) is it any surprise that a woman just might attempt to use that "favor" for her financial gain?
I've known a handful of single mother's who have intentionally had multiple children from different fathers. You might call this slutty behavior - I call it a business. You see, having 3 children with the same father brings in substantially less (usually at least 35%) child support than having 3 children from 3 different fathers. Is it such a stretch to consider that having octuplets, when one already has 6 children, might be an opportunity for a better life for all children involved?
I know, children as a commodity isn't anything anyone wants to acknowledge, but ask any divorced, non-custodial parent if they feel access to their children is dictated by the amount and timeliness of child support payments, and you'll realize we have accepted children as a commodity in our society. Is this the case with Ms. Doud? Unless she actually comes out and admits it (highly unlikely), we'll never know. Should it matter? Oh, I think it does, and I think if one really analyzes the situation, it speaks volumes to where we are ethically as a society, not just in Ms. Doud's fertility choices, but in our support of a media system that glorifies, then judges those choices.
It should come as no surprise that people might see multiple births as an opportunity to be famous. What with YouTube, American Idol and Survivor, just to name a few, we've raised a generation who not only strives to be famous at any cost (public humiliation seeming to be a favorite), but actually believes they are "entitled" fame. Add in a few shows like John and Kate Plus 8 and the new Duggar Family series, 17 Kids and Counting, and it becomes clear that our society financially rewards the "freak show."
Now, part of the problem stems from the fact that, with a rare exception, families cannot afford to raise 8 ... or 17 ... children. According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture's new Cost of Raising a Child Calculator, the average family will spend $171,926 raising a single child from birth through high school graduation. Multiply that times 14 (the number of children it is now known the Californian mom has) and you've got a total cost of $2,406,964. That number doesn't include the anticipated $1.2 million in medical expenses projected just in the birth, delivery and hospital care (2 months) for these octuplets. Being that they were born 9 weeks prematurely, it's likely they will have additional medical expenses - above and beyond what a parent can "normally" expect.
In this era of women's reproductive rights (at the expense of anyone elses rights - father's, embryo's, child's, society's, etc.) is it any surprise that a woman just might attempt to use that "favor" for her financial gain?
I've known a handful of single mother's who have intentionally had multiple children from different fathers. You might call this slutty behavior - I call it a business. You see, having 3 children with the same father brings in substantially less (usually at least 35%) child support than having 3 children from 3 different fathers. Is it such a stretch to consider that having octuplets, when one already has 6 children, might be an opportunity for a better life for all children involved?
I know, children as a commodity isn't anything anyone wants to acknowledge, but ask any divorced, non-custodial parent if they feel access to their children is dictated by the amount and timeliness of child support payments, and you'll realize we have accepted children as a commodity in our society. Is this the case with Ms. Doud? Unless she actually comes out and admits it (highly unlikely), we'll never know. Should it matter? Oh, I think it does, and I think if one really analyzes the situation, it speaks volumes to where we are ethically as a society, not just in Ms. Doud's fertility choices, but in our support of a media system that glorifies, then judges those choices.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~